Sorry, but anyone trying to find sunlight among the five women in this category is doomed

(AP) NEW YORK – There’s “Follies” and then there’s folly. The first is a winning revival of Stephen Sondheim’s musical that wowed Broadway this season. The other is how you can characterize any attempt to handicap Sunday’s Tony Awards. But here goes.

Pictures: Tony nominees 2012Complete list of nomineesComplete Coverage: The 66th annual Tony Awards

BEST MUSICALWill win: “Newsies.” Should win: “Once.”

More in The 2012 Tony Awards

This is the battle of extremes – the stripped-down, bittersweet magic of “Once” versus the pump-you-up appeal of classic razzle-dazzle in “Newsies.” Both are a great night out, just different. Both came from movies and only “Newsies” has new songs written specifically for the stage, giving it an edge with Tony voters. But “Once” just makes you feel, well, good. As for the other contenders, “Leap of Faith” doesn’t have a chance since it’s already closed, and “Nice Work If You Can Get It” is a fun romp, but not as strong as its cousin “Anything Goes.”

BEST PLAYWill win: “Clybourne Park.” Should win: “Clybourne Park.”

Bruce Norris’ sly, edgy gem has the same heat on it that Jon Robin Baitz’s “Other Desert Cities” had when it opened in the winter. That doesn’t make it better, just fresher. Both plays prove Broadway is putting on great American works again. The oh-so-cool “Peter and the Starcatcher” and the naughty “Venus in Fur” are inventive and bold, but not broad enough to tickle everyone.

REVIVAL-PLAYWill win: “Death of a Salesman.” Should win: “Death of a Salesman.”

Arthur Miller’s masterpiece is timely and there is so much to like – the recreated original set and music, the directing of Mike Nichols and the performances by Philip Seymour Hoffman, 카지노사이트 Linda Emond and Andrew Garfield – that even if one part leaves you cold, the others will not. The revival of Gore Vidal’s “The Best Man” was also timely and had the season’s most insane collection of talented stage actors ever assembled, but it attacked your head. Miller’s play took your guts.

REVIVAL-MUSICALWill win: “Follies.” Should win: “The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess.”

The only thing certain in this category is that the two revivals from Tim Rice and Andrew Lloyd Webber – “Evita” and “Jesus Christ Superstar” – will cancel each other out, leaving the prize between a proud, confident Stephen Sondheim revival against the show he denigrated before it opened. That was uncool, especially when the re-imagined opera turned out to be rather stunning as a musical. But Sondheim’s dirt-throwing may make Tony voters squeamish, leaving “Follies” the win. “I Loves You, Porgy,” indeed.

ACTOR-PLAYWill win: Philip Seymour Hoffman (“Death of a Salesman”). Should win: James Corden (“One Man, Two Guvnors”).

That sounds insane, right? A deeply affecting Willy Loman losing to a British clown? But, if you recall, Hoffman’s performance wasn’t universally cheered, while Corden’s has been. Corden might be brimming with humor as much as Hoffman is stalked by sadness, but in terms of MVP, imagine taking Hoffman out of “Death of a Salesman.” Now imagine “One Man, Two Guvnors” without Corden. Miller’s play would still float, but the farce would likely sink.

ACTRESS-PLAYWill win: Someone who deserves it. Should win: Tracie Bennett (“End of the Rainbow”).

Sorry, but anyone trying to find sunlight among the five women in this category is doomed. Like last year, it’s just too hard. Nina Arianda is painfully delicious in “Venus in Fur,” Tracie Bennett is insanely good in “End of the Rainbow,” Stockard Channing is brilliantly brittle in “Other Desert Cities,” Linda Lavin is arch and hysterical in “The Lyons,” and Cynthia Nixon was heartbreaking in “Wit.” No offense to any of them, but Bennett’s performance is the complete package – acting, singing and descending into pill-popping madness. Perhaps the wisest course is to abandon the attempt and cheer the sheer strength of women on Broadway.

ACTOR-MUSICALWill win: Steve Kazee (“Once”). Should win: Norm Lewis (“The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess”).

This category is also pretty wide open, with the veteran Danny Burstein of “Follies” and the up-and-coming Jeremy Jordan of “Newsies” leading most polls. But Burstein may lose votes to his “Follies” co-star Ron Raines, and it may be too soon this year for the talented Jordan, who undoubtedly will have many Tony ceremonies to come. The effortless ease in which Steve Kazee played the aw-shucks hero in “Once” acts against him, especially against Norm Lewis, who shuffles across the stage and belts out his songs in “The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess” from a deep, vulnerable place. But Kazee should benefit by riding his musical’s winning Tony wave.

ACTRESS-MUSICALWill win: Audra McDonald (“The Gershwins’ Porgy and Bess”). Should win: Audra McDonald.

Audra McDonald is this year’s Sutton Foster – the clear leading candidate. But Jan Maxwell in “Follies” was astonishing and she’s an honorable silver to McDonald’s gold. McDonald has four Tonys already, but never for a lead actress. That will change Sunday and deservedly so. She is graceful and tender and strong – and simply the best thing about Catfish Row. Tony voters will sing “I Loves You, Bess.”

Related Posts

But those who watched Ritts’ work over the years are not surprised that collectors want to own his pictures, which don’t come cheap: Prices can range from $40,000 up to $125,000. “His photographs are in a class of their own,” said lang. “You can just recognize a Herb Ritts photo from, you know, ten paces.” k.d. lang and Ritts collaborated on a Vanity Fair cover which made a big splash in the summer of 1993. “Where’d the idea come from?” asked Braver. “I just wanted to do something in a barber’s chair,” Lang replied. “Oh, he goes, that’s great. And then he calls me and he goes, ‘I’m gonna ask Cindy.'” “I’m like … ‘Cindy!'” lang laughed. “He said, ‘Can you come to the studio? I’m shooting kd lang and I wanna use you as a prop,'” Crawford recalled. “And I had that kind of relationship with Herb where I was like ‘OK,’ you know? “I thought Herb nailed it. And it became one of those images that people will always remember.” There are many Herb Ritts photos that people will always remember. Some of his most beautiful are not your typical glamour shots. Churchward described Ritts’ month-long trip to Africa where he got Massai warriors to be “fashion icons.” “They were having a great time,” Churchward laughed. “And the fact is that he wanted to prove that he could use his eye anywhere.” Ritts learned in 1989 that he had AIDS, but he worked up until the very end. His last shoot was of Ben Affleck for Vanity Fair. One last photograph by a man who never stopped trying to top himself. “What do you think we missed by not seeing him mature as a photographer?” Braver asked lang. “He put everything, a lifetime of knowledge and wisdom and his eye for art into that short amount of years,” she said. “Who knows what the plan is … but I can only imagine what his photos would have been like.” For more info: •  Herb Ritts Foundation
In it, Garzon, a slightly-built 52-year-old with short-cropped gray hair and glasses, appears shaken and at times hesitant. He sits in a simple chair in front of the judge, with four rows of chairs behind him in the small courtroom. Garzon is wearing a dark jacket and trousers with an open-necked shirt. Behind him are two men in dark uniforms, and several other unidentified people are in the room. He also answers questions from a prosecutor. Garzon’s testimony added little new to what is already known about the crash on the evening of July 24 as the high-speed train, carrying 218 people in eight carriages, approached the capital of Spain’s northwestern Galician region. But the video was the public’s first look at the court testimony of the driver who walked away from the accident with a gash in his head. ABC said its footage showed 18 minutes of excerpts from the full 55-minute session, accompanied by what it said was a transcript of the full session. The paper said it obtained a copy of the video that the court took of the session but has not made public. The train had been going as fast as 119 mph (192 kph) shortly before the derailment. The driver activated the brakes “seconds before the crash,” reducing the speed to 95 mph (153 kph), according to the court’s preliminary findings based on black box data recorders. The speed limit on the section of track where the crash happened was 50 mph (80 kph). In his Sunday night testimony, Garzon said he was going far over the speed limit and ought to have started slowing down several miles (kilometers) before he reached the notorious curve. Asked whether he ever hit the brakes, Garzon replied, “The electric one, the pneumatic one … all of them. Listen, when … but it was already inevitable.” His voice shakes, his sentences break down and he appears close to tears as he replies to a question about what was going through his mind when he went through the last tunnel before the curve. “If I knew that I wouldn’t think it because the burden that I am going to carry for the rest of my life is huge,” he said. “And I just don’t know. The only thing I know, your honor, sincerely, is that I don’t know. I’m not so crazy that I wouldn’t put the brakes on.” Garzon said that after the derailment he called central control in Madrid about the accident. “At the speed I was going and the smashup, though I couldn’t see what was behind me. I knew what I was up against and I knew it was inevitable that there was a calamity and so (I called Madrid) to activate the emergency protocol,” he testified. Garzon also explained a photograph on his Facebook page which showed a train speedometer registering 124 mph (200 kph). He said he took the photo “as a laugh or whatever you want to call it” while a colleague was driving a test train on a different track some time ago. His Facebook page was taken down shortly after the crash. It is not known who removed it. The investigating judge is trying to establish whether human error or a technical failure caused the country’s worst rail accident in decades, and Garzon is at the center of the investigation. The judge provisionally charged Garzon on Sunday with multiple counts of negligent homicide. Garzon was not sent to jail or required to post bail because none of the parties involved felt there was a risk of him fleeing or attempting to destroy evidence, according to a court statement. National rail company Renfe said Garzon is an employee with 30 years of experience who became an assistant driver in 2000 and a fully qualified driver in 2003. Garzon went back to court, voluntarily, to offer more testimony on Wednesday. In that second appearance, he said he was talking by phone to the train’s on-board ticket inspector moments before the accident and hung up just before the train left the tracks. But that contradicted what the court said the black boxes showed – that Garzon was on the phone at the time of the derailment. The court said the inspector would testify Friday as a witness. It said the judge has ruled that while the phone call was inappropriate it could not be considered a cause of the accident. Health authorities say 57 people from the crash are still in the hospital, 11 of them in critical condition.
She lives in South Orange, a suburb just west of Newark

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *