The repercussions have been unsurprising: Cards and letters ending up at the wrong house

TOKYO — Through a bizarre bureaucratic mistake, hundreds of residents in a central Japanese city have been stuck for almost 70 years with an unusual headache. About 250 households in Gifu City’s Sagiyama district have shared the exact same address.

The repercussions have been unsurprising: Cards and letters ending up at the wrong house. Pizza deliveries gone missing. Dinner guests driving around and around endlessly, trying in vain to locate their host’s home. Car navigation systems are rendered useless. And most alarming, ambulances and fire engines are often unable to find the right location.

The strange situation began in 1950, in the lean years just after World War II. With almost every city bombed to devastation, Japan was severely short of housing, and Gifu was in a rush to put roofs over families. But in its haste to ease homelessness, the city somehow neglected to draw residential lots. Hence, a whole 10-acre neighborhood ended up with the address “1769-2, Sagiyama, Gifu City.”

For years efforts to sort out the mess have been hampered by squabbling over where to draw the new property lines. 

But sanity seems to have prevailed. By early next year, each house is scheduled to be assigned its very own street number.

Some old-timers are none too pleased, arguing that they’ve gotten used to sharing an address with 250 of their closest neighbors and 부산출장안마 don’t find it a burden at all.

A few have fretted to local media about the downside of getting a new address; every single legal document, from driver’s licenses to bank accounts and utility bills to property registration and social security forms, is going to need an update. 

Related Posts

{Taiwan lawmakers brawl on legislative floor over nuclear plant bill|Nuclear power has long been a contentious issue in Taiwan and became more so following the Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan in 2011|If the referendum is passed it could become operational by 2016|
TIMELINE: “Dancing” Through the Seasons “Some viewers reported experiencing difficulties registering their votes for the Dancing with the Stars finale, which affected each finalist equally,” show producers said in a statement. “The issue was promptly addressed” and voting times were not extended. The finalists performed their last dances for viewer votes on Monday’s episode, which count for half of their overall scores toward the title. The judges’ scores for each competitor’s two dances Tuesday will be added to their overall Monday totals. The dancer with the highest combined total of judges’ points and viewer votes will become the new “Dancing” champ. Grey comes into Tuesday’s season finale in first place. The 50-year-old actress and her professional partner, Derek Hough, earned a perfect score of 60 for their two dances on Monday’s show. Massey finished in second place with 56 points, while Palin landed in third with 52 points. “Dancing” executive producer Conrad Green said it would be fair game if Palin’s voters send her to victory Tuesday. Palin said on Monday’s episode that “there’s lots of haters out there that are waiting for me to fail,” but added after the show that she feels she and Ballas deserve to win. “We’ve been working our butts off,” the 20-year-old single mom said. Grey said she won’t consider the mirrorball trophy until Tuesday’s dances are done. “I think it’s bad juju,” she said after earning a perfect score Monday. Massey and his partner, Lacey Schwimmer, said they’ve been having so much fun dancing together, they can hardly believe they actually have a chance at the title. “We have a one-in-three shot,” Schwimmer said. “It’ll be crazy if we win,” Massey said. “I’ll be excited. I’ll probably do the worm again.” (The 19-year-old Disney Channel star did the retro dance move during his freestyle routine on Monday’s show.)
The movie, which is set in Scotland, centers around Merida, who defies her mother’s wish to get married, and through her actions, accidentally causes chaos in the kingdom}

No comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *